Thought while it is assumed to be, within its uniqueness, the only source to conceptualize the concept of existence it only stands to dissolve itself as I am taking ( thinking) thought to be the only way to prove my existence . An alternative to this idea would be to believe that god has defined our existence but this will again be seen through the limitation of my thought (the sole remaining option) to be able to even accept god as the source.
As there is no alternative way to realize that god or thought is the source of existence, it seems necessary and more than that inevitable to give my thought or god the reason for our existence ( I don’t mean to neglect other concepts that may prove existence ) but god and thought seem to be most the common choices .
Thought in this situation in accordance with my thinking takes precedence as our current comprehension of life forces me to realize that thought is the only concept that I am aware of. So in reality it is a fight between the awareness of the human mind and faith. Keeping cause and effect as my centre of reality, I would rather choose the awareness of thought over the unawareness of god. Therefore thought is itself a function of awareness.
If I don’t have the ability to conceptualize existence, then I wouldn’t exist in my thought or I wouldn’t be aware of my existence at all which would undermine reality itself which is highly likely in the god situation, that is if god is the source of existence, then the only way I exist is through his definition of existence and not the conceptualized human version. If I choose thought then I will be aware or know that I don’t exist. Thus falling into a loop of thought leading to existence at the same time leading to inexistence and viewing existence objectively ergo not only assuming the fact that only thought can define existence but that the my concept of existence is what “existence” is in its truest form .
The only possible way to disprove this infinite loop is to provide proof of my inexistence but if I can conceptualize the proof of my inexistence then I fall back into the loop.
Thus unless there is a clear and alternative source god or any other entity in this case to provide me with the definition of existence, which is beyond the limitations of my thought , there is no plausible way to shoot off tangentially from the loop .
I also conclude that that if such an entity does exist which is beyond our comprehension, it would disprove most established theories, leading to the destruction of human pursuit and development itself .
In conclusion I believe that god if ever decides to reveal himself would only destroy our development and growth as an intelligent species. Which goes against the concept of god himself ergo he will never reveal himself.
PS: Have faith ...it is easier .
No comments:
Post a Comment